Shelley St.Pierre Dufresne & Rachel Alyse Respess, Destrehan, Louisiana (suspended Sept 2014)

Discussion in 'Cougars' started by News Readers, Sep 29, 2014.

  1. john smith

    john smith Active Member

    To miketx100

    Certainly all sounds plausible. Very detailed insider information. Can you share how you came by it?

    That Dufresne's daddy was likely the one who got her started with "intensive mental health treatment" was kinda a given. The man knows what a perp needs to do to make a judge conducive to showing leniency. This is his kid, I'm sure he's going to do everything he can to help her with his consult. We'd all do the same in his shoes.
     
  2. Oxman2010

    Oxman2010 Registered Member

    Miketx100 Fyi - Assuming everything you said was factual, I have a difference in opinion about one thing you said....that what respess and dufresne did together before things started with this kid is their business alone. If there has been prior occasions of lesbian, group or same room sexual play between dufresne and respess, it speaks a lot to respess's culpability. You paint a picture of respess as knowing dufresne intended to have sex with the kid at her place but that she had no intention of of participating until urged on by dufresne. If the two had a sexual relationship already, or a history of meeting for group sex with other males, than respess agreeing to Dufresne bringing the boy to her place, especially after Dufresne's "who knows what might happen" comment, it would be pretty hard for respess to argue there was no premeditation on her part. Knowing dufresne was having sex with the kid, agreeing to letting them come over and making sure it would be just the three of them...coupled with a history of similar activities with dufresne... As far as I'm concerned, respess knew exactly what was going to happen and was a willing and fully culpable participant the moment she said "sure, bring the boy over."
     
  3. TMP

    TMP Himself

    @Oxman2010 @john smith @miketx100

    Just a note -- the forum software allows you to "tag" other users that you are addressing or referring to by placing a "@" in front of the user name. After you type 2 or 3 chars it will even do a partial name match. Tagged users then receive notifications depending on how they have configured their personal options
     
  4. interestedthirdparty

    interestedthirdparty Registered Member

    I am going to say that everything @miketx100 has said could be plausible. However, his consistent misspelling of Respess either points to an utter lack of detail to what it actually happening *or* to the fact that he is simply lying. I doubt he is an insider, but rather gleaning information from other sources--and there are many sources of information, particularly in forums in and around South Louisiana.
     
  5. Oxman2010

    Oxman2010 Registered Member

    @TMP @miketx100 @miketx100 @interestedthirdparty

    Yep, at least when I engage in supposition, it comes across that way. At least I hope so...

    Thanks for the tip on using @ to tag. I'm not that experienced a blogger / commentor, if that wasn't already evident.

    As to the validity of milerx100 comments...Who knows. It's odd that he would write in such detail if he was truly clueless. All I know is his story makes a little better sense than my suppositions....Time will tell.
     
  6. Oxman2010

    Oxman2010 Registered Member

    Ps...oxman2010 and stilgar11 are both me. I'd forgotten my previous user name and established a second this past week.
     
  7. miketx100

    miketx100 Registered Member

    I had so many pages opened, my browser kept freezing and as I typed, letters and words would freeze; didn't feel like going back and proof reading. The extent of the relationship between the two teachers is really a quagmire at the moment. Deviant curiosity of course peeks the interest; were they bi-sexual lovers, quite possible. Was it a drunken one time thing, just as possible. None of the teachers are speaking, as they have both lawyered up. And none of them are going to speak until the DA's start wheeling and dealing( nobody wants to see this thing go to trial, NOBODY). But to what end. Any plea deal offered will come with multiple years in prison, more for Dufrense then Respress, because of the muliple encounters. Rest assure, the city, county, and school district are all under a magnifying glass here, and are not going to settle for anything less then the extent of the crime. Respress invited them both to their home, provided alcohol to both of them. Did she know they would all wind up in bed together when the night started, from what she has said, no; but one thing led to another and it happened. She was aware that Dufrense and the student had a sexual relationship. Dufrense asked her not to have any people over at the apartment. Respress agreed.

    On a personal note, I have had a number of FFM encounters with ex gf's; as I'm sure many other men have as well. I know this; everytime it happened, it was one female doing a favor or giving in to the other females request to have a 3some. It appears this incident was no different, but does not mean they are not equally culpable.
     
    threesome likes this.
  8. john smith

    john smith Active Member

    @miketx100

    You still haven't explained how you know details that have yet to be published....?

    And I'm sorry, but a teacher wanting nothing to do with a teacher-student sex scenario would have understood the implications of saying yes to a fellow teacher asking to use her pad for such a sexual encounter...especially while remaining in the residence as the two do the dirty deed. If they were best friends, fine, maybe respess would be willing to stay quite about what she knew her friend was doing. But I highly doubt she would have consented to the use of her place unless she was intending on being involved.
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2014
  9. TMP

    TMP Himself

    Most states today have mandatory disclosure laws that apply to educators. Remaining quiet when you know of child abuse is itself a crime.
     
  10. interestedthirdparty

    interestedthirdparty Registered Member

    @miketx100 is not an insider. He continues to misspell Rachel Respess' name. If he knew her, he would know the correct pronunciation and that there is only one 'R' in her last name. I'm going to call BS.
     
  11. Oxman2010

    Oxman2010 Registered Member

    I don't dissagree. Just giving the guy the opportunity to explain. If he is part of the local community and is just reflecting the local scuttle-butt, fine, then he should say so. In the court of public opinion, the local rumor mill may still offer helpful info for consideration beyond the info published by the investigating police. It just shouldn't be stated as fact....
     
  12. john smith

    john smith Active Member

    Understood. I was making the point that even if Respess had participated in prior (legal) exploits with Dufresne, if she truly wanted nothing to do with sexually abusing a student, she wouldn't have allowed Dufresne the use of her apartment to commit such an act. I was just suggesting that at most someone in Respess's position might have been willing to stay quite about what she knew her friend was up to....but she wouldn't have allowed herself to be involved beyond that....unless, that is, she wanted to participant. And yes, she would still have been criminally culpable for staying quite and not reporting the offense.

    Guess I was a bit bugged by miketx100 painting Respess as someone who had no intention of sexually abusing this student until she was goaded into it that night by her pal Dufresne. I think it's pretty obvious that long before Dufresne knocked on Respess's door with her boy toy in tow, Respess knew they were coming, that sexually abusing the kid was the ONLY thing on the agenda for the evening, and that she would be participating in one way or another....anyone who thinks otherwise is in denial of the obvious.
     
  13. miketx100

    miketx100 Registered Member

    I am not an insider, etc, but what information I posted is accurate. I didn't sugar coat it for any purpose, extend it past anything I have come across. Never went out to paint Respress ( or whatever her name is ) as a naive figure. But from what she has maintained, this to her family, and what little she gave to law enforcement, they were all going to hang out that night ( and she was well aware that Dufrense and the student would be sexually active), but an encounter between all three of them was not pre-arranged. But she is well aware what she did was unlawful. On a personal note, I tend to favor what her position is. I really do find it unfathomable that these two individuals would coerce during the week to have a 16 year old over to the apartment for the sole purpose to have a 3 way sexual encounter with him. As much as that is the story that has been put out there, think it might be reaching a bit. And I don't think what law enforcement has released is making this thing any less scandalous. Last week they released in their report that the encounter lasted until 9am, when in reality, the three fell asleep and woke up sometime after 8, and Dufrense drove the student to pick up his car. I imagine the full details will only come out after the case has been adjuticated and someone is able to file a FOA and get the full police reports. I will no longer be posting.
     
  14. interestedthirdparty

    interestedthirdparty Registered Member

    What information you have posted is the same speculation, supposition, and conjecture discussed in other forums. The three threads on the previously mentioned forum where the scandal first broke have all been removed by administrators. I suspect there are other forums you're reading closer to the town in question, where others with more detailed inside information have been posting. I have read them, as well.

    The police report makes no mention that the sexual encounter lasted until 9:00AM, only that they parted company at that time. They are in fact charged with other crimes, which makes the time they parted company important. The fact that the crime involving Respess (R-E-S-P-E-S-S) happened in another jurisdiction, and one in which the minor child did not reside, matters greatly since Dufresne is facing charges in two places.

    Also, it really doesn't matter very much to Respess' case if there was intent to commit a crime on her part or not. She did, and she provided the place for it to happen. Plenty of time for second thoughts. She knew the risks.

    Look, I am not looking to run posters off. That isn't my intention, nor will it ever be. However, it is dangerous and dishonest for anyone to post as fact any information that is not publicly available.
     
  15. threesome

    threesome Registered Member


    Everything that guy wrote has been corroborated by the accounts of other people, the police report, and witnesses.


    I do however, not buy Respess excuse that she did not intend to get sexually involved. You allow them to use your apartment knowing they are sexually involved, you agree not to invite anyone else to your place, you allow them to sleep over, and you provide alcohol. Give me a break
     
  16. john smith

    john smith Active Member

    Yes, of course, when it comes to an adult who was caught sexually abusing a minor, the police and her family are the ones she is going to be totally forthcoming with. No desire to sugar coat one's culpability in the event when talking to the detectives who will put you away in jail or your family who is being hurt and humiliated by your deviant behavior.

    And yes, of course, when Dufresne admitted to her (alleged) les-b-friend that she was having sex with the boy, that she wanted to bring the boy over to her place for that purpose, asked Respess to make sure nobody else was there and then made comments like "who knows what might happen if we all get drunk".... Even putting aside for the moment the notion that Dufresne and Respess had likely shared intimate encounters before.....Just what do you think Respess was thinking was on the agenda after giving them the OK to come spend the night....that they would play monopoly into the wee hours of the morning, and that whenever Dufresne gave her a wink, Respess would go for a walk to give them their privacy?

    The more this is discussed the more I believe the answer to just how culpable Respess was lies in her history of sexual exploration with Dufresne. I think most would agree there had to be some kind of prior history for Dufresne to feel comfortable not only admitting her sexual activity with the kid, but especially to ask the use of Respess's apartment to commit further acts. A normal friend would never have said yes to that unless they were of a similar mindset. Was Respess thinking she would be having full intercourse with the boy prior to Dufresne and him arriving? Who knows. But I'm willing to bet big money that both Dufresne and Respess, whether it was spoken about directly or via innuendo, fully anticipated and desired three way play of some kind. Regardless of Respess trying to deflect blame away from herself, regardless of whether each sex act was planned....the group play was definitely a premeditated thing. Just my humble opinion.
     
    threesome likes this.
  17. threesome

    threesome Registered Member

    ...

    From what I gather, the victim and Dufresne woke up first and had sex again while Respess was still passed out drunk. The boy then began slapping Respess' face with his penis and filmed it. Apparently they felt he was well endowed so that could be a huge factor into why they couldn't resist sleeping with him

    ...

    [Paragraphs with profanities and other offensive language were removed by a moderator.]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 16, 2014
  18. rusmason

    rusmason Registered Member

    I will agree with the "mystery" poster that it is possible that the 2nd culprit was not aware or made plans of a possible threesome with the student. Of course your going to have one who is either consumed by love, sex, or some type of personality disorder that allows them to risk so much for a few hours of sex. But to have a 2nd, who is able and willing to do it; planned out and executed? I find it very hard to believe that 2 educated individuals could be so gullible and dumb during the course of a week. The 2nd culprit could have all the sex she wants. Single, attractive, her own place. Why with a 16 year old kid? No sense at all. But, if the 1st culprit has enough power over the 2nd one, I could see how she could fall into the trappings that night. There is no way that it as simple as, hey let's have a threesome at your place with Student A at your place Friday night. I find that hard to believe. If you look at her arrest picture( culprit 2), she has the look like she's been crying for days and the 'what the F did I get myself into look".

    I think the big deal here is the 3some element. But this type of stuff goes on all the time. The funny thing is, according to research, for every teacher/student sexual relation that is exposed, there are 4-5 that are not. Which means, there are some students who are really good at keeping their mouth shut that they had sexual relations with their teacher.

    On a side note, the hottest teacher to get busted sleeping with a student is named Brianne out of Utah, Google her.
     
  19. TMP

    TMP Himself

    No need to Google, we have have her:


    If hottest is measured in hits & pageviews, Kinsly Wentsky is probably #2 after the Destrehan twins:


    Kinsley was so popular that she took out our server on the 2nd day. I had to keep the site offline for several days until I had moved the site to a new internet provider, otherwise her hits & pageviews would have been much, much higher.

    There are a couple other "high volume" cougars, but their apparent popularity derives from other factors.
     
  20. threesome

    threesome Registered Member

    You're giving her way too much credit. Maybe it wasn't explicitly said but it was definitely implied. Her agreeing to all the terms laid out by dufresne all but sealed the inevitable fate of the threesome. She knew this, anybody who sees the facts will know this or is just being naive. Her place is one bedroom, was she planning on sleeping on the couch while they had sex and crashed? Give me a break

    You say she has the look of someone who's been crying in her mugshot photo. I see a hint of a surpressed smile tbh